Benchmarking tests database high availability by simulating real-world failures and measuring how the system responds. These tests focus on metrics like recovery time, data consistency, and service continuity during disruptions. For example, a benchmark might intentionally crash a primary database node to see if a secondary node takes over within an acceptable timeframe. It could also simulate network partitions to verify if the system maintains read/write capabilities or gracefully degrades performance without data loss. By systematically introducing faults, developers can identify weak points in failover mechanisms, replication lag, or load-balancing policies.
Key metrics in these tests include Recovery Time Objective (RTO), which measures how quickly the system resumes normal operations after a failure, and Recovery Point Objective (RPO), which quantifies the maximum data loss tolerated. Tools like Chaos Monkey or custom scripts automate failure injection, such as killing processes, throttling network bandwidth, or corrupting disks. For instance, a benchmark might disconnect a replica node during heavy write operations to validate if the primary node queues transactions and resynchronizes data correctly once the replica rejoins. Tests also evaluate split-brain scenarios—like two nodes believing they’re the primary—to ensure conflict resolution protocols work as intended. These scenarios help developers tune heartbeat intervals, quorum configurations, or consensus algorithms like Raft.
Real-world benchmarking often combines synthetic workloads with failure simulations. For example, using a tool like Jepsen to test distributed databases (e.g., Cassandra or MongoDB) under network instability, or employing pgbench to stress-test PostgreSQL failover clusters. A typical test might involve running a read-heavy workload while abruptly terminating a node, then measuring query success rates and client-side timeouts. Results reveal whether connection pooling, retry logic, or client-side failover handles disruptions smoothly. Iterative benchmarking helps teams validate improvements—like reducing failover time from 30 seconds to 5 seconds—or uncover hidden issues, such as stale caches post-recovery. By repeating these tests across infrastructure changes, teams ensure high availability mechanisms remain robust as the system evolves.