Benchmarks assess schema optimization by measuring how effectively a database schema handles real-world workloads and resource usage. They evaluate factors like query performance, storage efficiency, and scalability under varying conditions. For example, a benchmark might compare query execution times before and after restructuring tables, adding indexes, or changing normalization levels. This provides concrete data to determine whether schema changes achieve meaningful improvements without unintended trade-offs.
One key way benchmarks evaluate schema optimization is through query performance metrics. They run standardized queries and transactions to measure execution speed, throughput (queries processed per second), and latency. For instance, a denormalized schema might reduce JOIN operations in analytical workloads, leading to faster query times in benchmarks like TPC-H, which simulates data warehousing scenarios. Conversely, transactional benchmarks like TPC-C focus on normalization and indexing efficiency for high-concurrency OLTP systems. Benchmarks also track resource usage, such as CPU or memory overhead, to ensure optimizations don’t shift bottlenecks elsewhere. For example, adding too many indexes might speed up reads but slow down writes due to index maintenance costs.
Storage efficiency is another critical benchmark criterion. Optimized schemas should minimize redundant data while maintaining performance. Benchmarks measure disk space usage, data compression ratios, and I/O operations. For example, a schema using columnar storage for analytical workloads might show reduced storage footprint and faster scans in benchmarks like SSB (Star Schema Benchmark). Partitioning strategies, such as splitting tables by date ranges, are tested for their impact on query speed and maintenance overhead. Benchmarks also reveal trade-offs: a highly normalized schema might use less storage but require complex joins, while a denormalized one could consume more disk space but simplify queries.
Finally, benchmarks assess scalability and concurrency handling. They simulate high user loads, large datasets, and mixed workloads to test whether schema optimizations hold under stress. For example, a schema with poorly designed locks or transactions might fail under TPC-E’s emulation of brokerage firm workloads. Benchmarks also test how optimizations adapt to data growth: a partitioned schema might scale linearly for time-series data, while a non-partitioned one could degrade in performance. These tests help developers identify whether optimizations are robust enough for production-scale demands or require further refinement.