🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz

What challenges exist for developing AR on low-end devices?

Developing augmented reality (AR) for low-end devices presents challenges primarily due to hardware limitations, software optimization requirements, and sensor constraints. These devices often lack the processing power, memory, and advanced components needed to handle AR’s real-time demands, forcing developers to make trade-offs in performance, visual quality, and functionality.

First, hardware limitations severely restrict AR capabilities. Low-end devices typically have underpowered CPUs and GPUs, which struggle with tasks like real-time camera tracking, 3D rendering, and environment mapping. For example, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)—a core AR process—requires continuous sensor data processing to anchor virtual objects in the real world. On a low-end device, this can lead to lag, inaccurate object placement, or tracking failures. Additionally, thermal throttling becomes a problem: sustained high CPU/GPU usage causes overheating, forcing the device to reduce performance to cool down. This results in inconsistent frame rates or app crashes during prolonged AR sessions. Developers must simplify algorithms or reduce rendering quality to compensate, which can degrade the user experience.

Second, memory and storage constraints limit asset quality and app functionality. Low-end devices often have limited RAM (e.g., 2-3GB), making it difficult to load high-resolution 3D models or textures without causing stutters or crashes. Storage limitations also force developers to use compressed assets, reducing visual fidelity. For instance, a detailed AR character model might need to be replaced with a low-polygon version to fit within memory budgets. Furthermore, many low-end devices lack support for advanced AR frameworks like ARCore or ARKit, requiring developers to rely on less optimized, custom solutions. These alternatives may not handle occlusion, lighting, or physics as effectively, leading to less immersive experiences.

Third, poor-quality sensors and cameras on low-end devices introduce tracking inaccuracies. AR relies heavily on camera input and inertial sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes) to track device movement and environmental features. Low-end cameras often have lower resolution, slower autofocus, or inconsistent frame rates, making it harder to detect surfaces or track motion smoothly. For example, a budget device’s camera might struggle in low-light conditions, causing virtual objects to appear misplaced or unstable. Similarly, cheap sensors may produce noisy data, leading to jittery animations or drift. Some devices also lack depth sensors, forcing developers to use software-based depth estimation, which is computationally expensive and less accurate. These issues require additional software workarounds, further straining already limited resources.

Like the article? Spread the word