🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz

How does text embedding improve full-text search?

Text embedding improves full-text search by enabling semantic understanding of text, going beyond exact keyword matching. Traditional full-text search relies on lexical matches between query terms and indexed documents, which can miss relevant results if synonyms, related concepts, or contextual variations exist. Embeddings address this by converting text into numerical vectors that capture semantic relationships. For example, a search for “automobile” could match documents containing “car” or “vehicle” because their embedding vectors are mathematically similar, even if the exact words differ. This allows search systems to prioritize meaning over strict keyword overlap.

A key advantage of embeddings is their ability to handle nuanced language. For instance, consider a search for “how to fix a flat tire.” A keyword-based system might miss a document titled “Repairing punctured bicycle wheels” because it lacks the exact terms “fix,” “flat,” or “tire.” With embeddings, the semantic similarity between “punctured” and “flat,” or “bicycle” and “tire,” is captured in the vector space, making the document a relevant match. Embeddings also improve robustness to typos or phrasing variations. A query for “bicyle maintenance” could still retrieve results about “bicycles” because the embedding model interprets the misspelled term based on its context and similarity to correctly spelled counterparts.

Implementing text embedding in search systems typically involves preprocessing text with models like BERT, Sentence-BERT, or Word2Vec to generate vectors, which are then indexed in specialized databases (e.g., Elasticsearch with a vector search plugin, FAISS, or Pinecone). During queries, the search term is converted to a vector, and the system retrieves documents whose vectors are closest in the embedding space using metrics like cosine similarity. Developers can also combine traditional keyword scoring with embedding-based similarity for hybrid search, balancing precision and recall. For example, a travel app might use embeddings to ensure a search for “budget-friendly stays” includes results with “cheap hotels” or “affordable accommodations,” significantly improving user experience compared to keyword-only approaches.

Like the article? Spread the word