Benchmarks handle database encryption by measuring both performance impacts and security implementations. When encryption is enabled, databases must process additional operations like encrypting data before writes and decrypting during reads. Benchmarks simulate real-world workloads to evaluate how these operations affect latency, throughput, and resource usage. For example, a benchmark might run a series of read/write operations on an encrypted database and compare the results to an unencrypted baseline. Tools like TPC-C (for transactional systems) or YCSB (for NoSQL databases) are often adapted to include encryption scenarios, providing metrics on how encryption affects query execution times or storage overhead.
Encryption-specific factors in benchmarks include key management, algorithm choice, and encryption granularity. For instance, benchmarks might test AES-256 versus ChaCha20 to compare CPU overhead, or evaluate row-level encryption versus full-disk encryption. Key rotation processes—where encryption keys are periodically changed—are also measured for their impact on performance during key generation or re-encryption phases. Some benchmarks incorporate security validation, such as verifying that encrypted data isn’t inadvertently exposed in logs or memory dumps. Tools like sysbench can be extended with custom scripts to simulate encrypted transactions, while specialized frameworks like SQLCipher’s benchmarking suite focus on SQLite encryption performance, isolating encryption-related bottlenecks.
The trade-off between security and performance is a key focus. Benchmarks quantify how much encryption slows down operations—for example, a 20% increase in latency for encrypted INSERT queries in PostgreSQL using pgcrypto, or higher CPU usage when using MySQL’s transparent data encryption. Results help developers decide encryption strategies: column-level encryption might be sufficient for small datasets, while hardware-accelerated solutions like Intel AES-NI could mitigate overhead for large-scale systems. Benchmarks also reveal optimization opportunities, such as caching decrypted data in memory or offloading encryption to dedicated hardware. By providing concrete data, benchmarks enable informed decisions about balancing compliance requirements (like GDPR) with application performance needs.