text-embedding-3-small embeddings can be shortened to some extent, but any reduction involves a trade-off between efficiency and semantic fidelity. The model supports generating embeddings with fewer dimensions, which can reduce storage size and improve query speed. However, “without accuracy loss” depends heavily on the specific task and tolerance for retrieval quality changes.
In practice, shorter embeddings often work well for broad semantic tasks like high-level clustering or coarse search, where exact ranking precision is less critical. For example, if you are grouping similar documents or routing user queries to general categories, reducing dimensionality may have little visible impact. On the other hand, for fine-grained similarity ranking—such as distinguishing between very similar technical issues—shortening embeddings too aggressively can blur meaningful distinctions. Developers should validate changes by running retrieval tests on real queries and measuring result quality.
Vector databases such as Milvus and Zilliz Cloud make this experimentation easier. You can store multiple collections with different embedding dimensions and compare performance side by side. Smaller vectors consume less memory and index faster, which can significantly reduce costs at scale. The key is to treat dimensionality reduction as a tuning knob rather than a free optimization. With careful evaluation, text-embedding-3-small gives developers flexibility to balance efficiency and accuracy based on real workload requirements.
For more information, click here： https://zilliz.com/ai-models/text-embedding-3-small