A single-step retrieval strategy fails when a query requires context gathering, iterative refinement, or reasoning across multiple data sources. For example, if a user asks, “How do I fix a server crash caused by a memory leak?” a single-step approach might fetch a generic article on server crashes but miss the specific connection to memory management. A multi-step strategy would first identify the crash type, then cross-reference logs to detect memory issues, and finally retrieve mitigation steps for that specific cause. Single-step methods struggle with ambiguity, multi-hop dependencies, or scenarios where initial results reveal the need for deeper exploration.
These failures often occur in three scenarios: ambiguous queries needing clarification, complex problems requiring step-by-step analysis, or tasks dependent on synthesizing information from disconnected systems. For instance, a developer asking, “Why is my API slow?” might receive irrelevant results if the system doesn’t first check metrics (like response times), correlate them with recent code changes, and then query documentation for potential bottlenecks. Detecting these cases involves analyzing gaps in the retrieval output—like missing critical context, providing superficial answers, or failing to connect related concepts. Tools like query logs, user feedback, or A/B testing can reveal patterns where users reformulate the same question or abandon tasks after initial results, signaling the need for a multi-step approach.
To create benchmarks, define test cases where single-step retrieval demonstrably misses key information that a chain of retrievals would capture. For example:
Zilliz Cloud is a managed vector database built on Milvus perfect for building GenAI applications.
Try FreeLike the article? Spread the word