🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

  • Home
  • AI Reference
  • What is the relationship between embeddings and knowledge graphs?

What is the relationship between embeddings and knowledge graphs?

Embeddings and knowledge graphs are complementary tools for representing and processing structured information. Embeddings convert entities, relationships, or text into numerical vectors, capturing semantic or contextual similarities in a compact form. Knowledge graphs, on the other hand, explicitly model real-world entities (nodes) and their relationships (edges) in a structured format. The connection lies in how embeddings can enhance knowledge graphs by adding a layer of numerical semantics, enabling tasks like similarity search or machine learning integration that are difficult with graph structures alone.

For example, a knowledge graph might represent facts like “Paris is the capital of France” as nodes (Paris, France) connected by an edge (“capitalOf”). Embeddings can translate these nodes and edges into vectors. Techniques like TransE or Node2Vec generate embeddings where similar entities (e.g., Paris and Berlin) or relationships (e.g., “capitalOf” and “locatedIn”) cluster in vector space. This allows operations like finding entities analogous to Paris in function (e.g., Berlin as Germany’s capital) by comparing vector distances. Embeddings also enable knowledge graph completion—predicting missing edges by training models to infer relationships based on existing graph patterns and vector similarities.

The synergy between embeddings and knowledge graphs is practical for developers. Embeddings make graph data usable in machine learning models that require numerical inputs, such as recommendation systems (e.g., suggesting related products based on user-item interactions in a graph). Conversely, knowledge graphs provide structured context that improves embedding quality—for instance, using graph-based constraints to ensure embeddings respect hierarchical relationships (e.g., “Apple Inc.” ≠ “apple fruit”). Tools like PyTorch Geometric or libraries like gensim simplify implementing these techniques. However, challenges include maintaining consistency between the graph structure and embeddings during updates. Combining both approaches balances explicit knowledge representation (graphs) with implicit pattern recognition (embeddings), making systems more robust for tasks like semantic search or fraud detection.

Like the article? Spread the word

How we use cookies

This website stores cookies on your computer. By continuing to browse or by clicking ‘Accept’, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your site experience and for analytical purposes.