🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz

How can knowledge graphs be used for semantic search?

Knowledge graphs enhance semantic search by organizing data into interconnected entities and their relationships, enabling systems to understand context and meaning beyond keyword matching. A knowledge graph structures information as nodes (entities like people, places, or concepts) and edges (relationships between them). This allows search systems to interpret queries based on the connections within the graph. For example, a search for “Apple” could refer to the company, the fruit, or a music album. The knowledge graph resolves ambiguity by analyzing related entities—like linking “Apple” to “iPhone” or “Steve Jobs” for the company, versus “nutrition” or “recipes” for the fruit. This contextual understanding improves search accuracy by leveraging the graph’s structured data.

To implement semantic search with knowledge graphs, systems first map user queries to entities within the graph. This involves natural language processing (NLP) techniques to identify key terms and their relationships. For instance, a query like “films by Nolan” might expand to include Christopher Nolan’s works by traversing connections like “directed_by” edges between movies and his name. The graph can also infer indirect relationships: searching for “actors in Inception” could return Leonardo DiCaprio, but the graph might further surface actors who frequently collaborate with him. Query expansion and traversal are key here—systems use the graph to add synonyms, related concepts, or broader/narrower terms to the search scope. This ensures results capture the user’s intent, not just literal keywords.

The practical benefits of this approach include improved relevance, disambiguation, and support for complex queries. In e-commerce, a search for “wireless headphones under $100” might use a knowledge graph to link product attributes (brand, price range) and user reviews, surfacing items that match both explicit criteria and implicit needs (e.g., battery life). For technical documentation, a query like “Python data analysis” could return libraries like Pandas, tutorials, and related tools (NumPy, Matplotlib) based on their connections in the graph. Additionally, multilingual searches benefit from entity-based mapping—e.g., linking “chat” (French) to “cat” (English) via shared identifiers. By leveraging the structured relationships in knowledge graphs, developers can build search systems that better align with user intent and domain-specific contexts.

Like the article? Spread the word