🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz

How are embeddings maintained over time?

Embeddings are maintained over time through a combination of retraining, versioning, and incremental updates. Embeddings, which are numerical representations of data like text or images, are often generated by machine learning models such as neural networks. To keep them relevant as data or requirements change, the underlying models must be periodically retrained with updated datasets. For example, in natural language processing (NLP), new vocabulary or shifts in language usage (e.g., slang or technical terms) may require retraining a language model to ensure embeddings accurately reflect current semantics. Retraining can be resource-intensive, so teams often balance frequency with computational costs.

Another approach involves incremental learning, where models update embeddings without full retraining. Some algorithms, like dynamic word2vec or online learning variants, allow embeddings to adapt to new data by adjusting existing vectors incrementally. For instance, a recommendation system might use streaming user interaction data to fine-tune product embeddings weekly. However, not all models support this—transformers like BERT typically require full retraining. Versioning is also critical: teams often archive older embeddings to maintain compatibility with legacy systems while testing new versions in parallel. Tools like embedding registries or versioned storage (e.g., in databases like FAISS or Pinecone) help track changes and ensure consistency.

Challenges include balancing stability and adaptability. Frequent updates improve accuracy but risk introducing inconsistencies, especially if downstream applications (e.g., classifiers or search engines) rely on stable embeddings. For example, a semantic search tool using outdated embeddings might return irrelevant results after a language shift. To mitigate this, teams monitor embedding drift using metrics like cosine similarity between old and new vectors for the same data. Hybrid approaches, such as freezing core embeddings while training lightweight adapters for new domains, can also help. Ultimately, maintaining embeddings requires a mix of technical strategies (retraining pipelines, monitoring) and organizational practices (version control, documentation) tailored to the use case.

Like the article? Spread the word