🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz
  • Home
  • AI Reference
  • How might Sentence Transformers be used in combination with other modalities (for example, linking image captions to images or aligning audio transcript segments to each other)?

How might Sentence Transformers be used in combination with other modalities (for example, linking image captions to images or aligning audio transcript segments to each other)?

Sentence Transformers can be effectively combined with other modalities, such as images or audio, by creating shared embedding spaces that enable cross-modal retrieval and alignment. These models generate dense vector representations (embeddings) for text, which can be aligned with embeddings from other modalities using joint training or post-processing techniques. For example, linking image captions to images involves training a model where both text and image embeddings are mapped to a shared space, allowing similarity comparisons. Similarly, aligning audio transcript segments could involve embedding spoken text and audio features into the same space to identify overlaps or connections.

A practical application is cross-modal retrieval, such as searching images using text queries. Here, a Sentence Transformer encodes text captions, while a vision model (e.g., ResNet or ViT) processes images. During training, contrastive loss can be used to minimize the distance between matching image-text pairs and maximize it for mismatched pairs. For instance, an e-commerce platform could use this to let users search for products by describing them in natural language, with the system retrieving images whose embeddings are closest to the query’s text embedding. Tools like CLIP demonstrate this approach, but developers can build custom pipelines using Sentence Transformers for text and pre-trained vision models for images, fine-tuning them on domain-specific data.

For audio alignment, consider synchronizing podcast episodes with their transcripts. A Sentence Transformer could embed transcript segments, while an audio encoder (e.g., Wav2Vec) processes raw audio into embeddings. By computing similarity scores between audio and text embeddings, segments can be matched to their corresponding timestamps. This is useful for applications like video editing, where automatic subtitle synchronization requires aligning spoken dialogue with text. Another example is aligning multilingual audio content: transcripts in different languages, embedded via Sentence Transformers, can be linked to their translated audio counterparts by comparing embedding similarities, even if the audio itself isn’t translated.

Finally, multi-modal fusion extends these ideas to combine text, images, and audio for richer applications. A video search system might allow queries via text, audio clips, or images, with each modality processed by its respective encoder and mapped to a shared space. For instance, a query like “find scenes with dogs barking” could involve a text embedding from Sentence Transformers, an audio embedding of barking sounds, and image embeddings of dogs, all contributing to the search results. Similarly, content moderation systems could flag mismatched content (e.g., an image labeled “cat” but containing a dog) by comparing text and image embeddings. By integrating Sentence Transformers with modality-specific encoders and training on aligned datasets, developers can build flexible systems that leverage the strengths of each data type.

Like the article? Spread the word