Yes, embeddings can overfit. Overfitting occurs when a model learns patterns specific to the training data that don’t generalize to unseen data. Embeddings, which are vector representations of discrete inputs like words or categories, are learned during training and can absorb noise or idiosyncrasies in the training set. For example, if a text classification model is trained on a small dataset, its word embeddings might encode rare or irrelevant associations from the training text, harming performance on new data. This is especially likely when the embedding dimension is too large relative to the dataset size, allowing the model to “memorize” instead of generalize.
A concrete example involves training embeddings for product reviews. Suppose a model associates the word “battery” with negative sentiment because the training data contains many complaints about a specific defective product. If the embeddings overfit, the model might incorrectly classify “battery life is amazing” as negative in production, even though “amazing” is positive. Similarly, in collaborative filtering (e.g., recommendation systems), user/item embeddings could overfit to noisy interactions in the training data, leading to poor recommendations for users with sparse or atypical behavior. Overfitting becomes more likely when embeddings are trained without regularization or on limited data.
To mitigate overfitting in embeddings, developers can apply techniques like dimensionality reduction, regularization, or using pre-trained embeddings. For instance, reducing the embedding size forces the model to compress information, discouraging memorization. Adding dropout or L2 regularization to the embedding layer can also help. Alternatively, initializing embeddings with pre-trained vectors (e.g., GloVe for text) and fine-tuning them sparingly leverages broader linguistic patterns while reducing reliance on small training sets. Monitoring validation performance during training is critical—if accuracy plateaus or drops while training loss keeps improving, it’s a sign embeddings (or the model) are overfitting.