튜토리얼: Milvus에서 시간 기반 랭킹 구현하기Compatible with Milvus 2.6.x
많은 검색 애플리케이션에서 콘텐츠의 최신성은 관련성만큼이나 중요합니다. 뉴스 기사, 제품 목록, 소셜 미디어 게시물, 연구 논문은 모두 의미적 관련성과 최신성의 균형을 맞추는 랭킹 시스템의 이점을 누릴 수 있습니다. 이 튜토리얼에서는 밀버스에서 붕괴 순위자를 사용하여 시간 기반 순위를 구현하는 방법을 설명합니다.
Milvus의 디케이 랭커 이해하기
디케이 랭커를 사용하면 기준점을 기준으로 한 숫자 값(타임스탬프 등)을 기준으로 문서에 점수를 높이거나 낮출 수 있습니다. 시간 기반 순위의 경우, 이는 의미적 관련성이 비슷하더라도 최신 문서가 오래된 문서보다 더 높은 점수를 받을 수 있음을 의미합니다.
Milvus는 세 가지 유형의 감쇠 랭커를 지원합니다:
가우스 (
gauss): 종 모양의 곡선으로 부드럽고 점진적인 감쇠를 제공합니다.지수 (
exp): 최근 콘텐츠를 강하게 강조하기 위해 더 날카로운 초기 드롭오프를 생성합니다.선형 (
linear): 예측 가능하고 이해하기 쉬운 직선형 감쇠를 제공합니다.
각 랭커는 다양한 사용 사례에 적합하도록 서로 다른 특성을 가지고 있습니다. 자세한 내용은 디케이 랭커 개요를 참조하세요.
시간 인식 검색 시스템 구축
관련성과 시간을 기준으로 콘텐츠의 순위를 효과적으로 매기는 방법을 보여주는 뉴스 기사 검색 시스템을 만들어 보겠습니다. 구현부터 시작하겠습니다:
import datetime
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from pymilvus import (
MilvusClient,
DataType,
Function,
FunctionType,
AnnSearchRequest,
)
# Create connection to Milvus
milvus_client = MilvusClient("http://localhost:19530")
# Define collection name
collection_name = "news_articles_tutorial"
# Clean up any existing collection with the same name
milvus_client.drop_collection(collection_name)
1단계: 스키마 설계
시간 기반 검색을 위해서는 콘텐츠와 함께 게시 타임스탬프를 저장해야 합니다:
# Create schema with fields for content and temporal information
schema = milvus_client.create_schema(enable_dynamic_field=False, auto_id=True)
schema.add_field("id", DataType.INT64, is_primary=True)
schema.add_field("headline", DataType.VARCHAR, max_length=200, enable_analyzer=True)
schema.add_field("content", DataType.VARCHAR, max_length=2000, enable_analyzer=True)
schema.add_field("dense", DataType.FLOAT_VECTOR, dim=1024) # For dense embeddings
schema.add_field("sparse_vector", DataType.SPARSE_FLOAT_VECTOR) # For sparse (BM25) search
schema.add_field("publish_date", DataType.INT64) # Timestamp for decay ranking
2단계: 임베딩 함수 설정
밀도(시맨틱) 및 스파스(키워드) 임베딩 함수를 모두 구성하겠습니다:
# Create embedding function for semantic search
text_embedding_function = Function(
name="siliconflow_embedding",
function_type=FunctionType.TEXTEMBEDDING,
input_field_names=["content"],
output_field_names=["dense"],
params={
"provider": "siliconflow",
"model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5",
"credential": "your-api-key"
}
)
schema.add_function(text_embedding_function)
# Create BM25 function for keyword search
bm25_function = Function(
name="bm25",
input_field_names=["content"],
output_field_names=["sparse_vector"],
function_type=FunctionType.BM25,
)
schema.add_function(bm25_function)
Milvus 임베딩 함수를 사용하는 방법에 대한 자세한 내용은 임베딩 함수 개요를 참조하세요.
3단계: 인덱스 매개변수 구성
빠른 벡터 검색을 위해 적절한 인덱스 파라미터를 설정해 보겠습니다:
# Set up indexes for fast search
index_params = milvus_client.prepare_index_params()
# Dense vector index
index_params.add_index(field_name="dense", index_type="AUTOINDEX", metric_type="L2")
# Sparse vector index
index_params.add_index(
field_name="sparse_vector",
index_name="sparse_inverted_index",
index_type="AUTOINDEX",
metric_type="BM25",
)
# Create the collection with our schema and indexes
milvus_client.create_collection(
collection_name,
schema=schema,
index_params=index_params,
consistency_level="Bounded"
)
4단계: 샘플 데이터 준비
이 튜토리얼에서는 게시 날짜가 서로 다른 뉴스 기사 세트를 만들어 보겠습니다. 콘텐츠는 거의 동일하지만 날짜가 다른 기사 쌍을 포함시켜 붕괴 순위 효과를 명확하게 보여줄 수 있도록 한 점을 주목하세요:
# Get current time
current_time = int(datetime.datetime.now().timestamp())
current_date = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(current_time)
print(f"Current time: {current_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')}")
# Sample news articles spanning different dates
articles = [
{
"headline": "AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement",
"content": "Researchers announced a major breakthrough in AI-based medical diagnostics, enabling faster and more accurate detection of rare diseases.",
"publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=120)).timestamp()) # ~4 months ago
},
{
"headline": "Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race",
"content": "Major technology companies are investing billions in a new race to develop the most advanced artificial intelligence systems.",
"publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=60)).timestamp()) # ~2 months ago
},
{
"headline": "AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body",
"content": "A consortium of international organizations has released new guidelines addressing ethical concerns in artificial intelligence development and deployment.",
"publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=30)).timestamp()) # 1 month ago
},
{
"headline": "Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress",
"content": "The newest generation of deep learning models demonstrates unprecedented capabilities in language understanding and generation.",
"publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=15)).timestamp()) # 15 days ago
},
# Articles with identical content but different dates
{
"headline": "AI Research Advancements Published in January",
"content": "Breakthrough research in artificial intelligence shows remarkable advancements in multiple domains.",
"publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=90)).timestamp()) # ~3 months ago
},
{
"headline": "New AI Research Results Released This Week",
"content": "Breakthrough research in artificial intelligence shows remarkable advancements in multiple domains.",
"publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=5)).timestamp()) # Very recent - 5 days ago
},
{
"headline": "AI Development Updates Released Yesterday",
"content": "Recent developments in artificial intelligence research are showing promising results across various applications.",
"publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=1)).timestamp()) # Just yesterday
},
]
# Insert articles into the collection
milvus_client.insert(collection_name, articles)
print(f"Inserted {len(articles)} articles into the collection")
5단계: 서로 다른 부패도 순위 구성하기
이제 각기 다른 매개 변수를 사용하여 차이를 강조하는 세 가지의 서로 다른 감쇠 순위 지정자를 만들어 보겠습니다:
# Use current time as reference point
print(f"Using current time as reference point")
# Create a Gaussian decay ranker
gaussian_ranker = Function(
name="time_decay_gaussian",
input_field_names=["publish_date"],
function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
params={
"reranker": "decay",
"function": "gauss", # Gaussian/bell curve decay
"origin": current_time, # Current time as reference point
"offset": 7 * 24 * 60 * 60, # One week (full relevance)
"decay": 0.5, # Articles from two weeks ago have half relevance
"scale": 14 * 24 * 60 * 60 # Two weeks scale parameter
}
)
# Create an exponential decay ranker with different parameters
exponential_ranker = Function(
name="time_decay_exponential",
input_field_names=["publish_date"],
function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
params={
"reranker": "decay",
"function": "exp", # Exponential decay
"origin": current_time, # Current time as reference point
"offset": 3 * 24 * 60 * 60, # Shorter offset (3 days vs 7 days)
"decay": 0.3, # Steeper decay (0.3 vs 0.5)
"scale": 10 * 24 * 60 * 60 # Different scale (10 days vs 14 days)
}
)
# Create a linear decay ranker
linear_ranker = Function(
name="time_decay_linear",
input_field_names=["publish_date"],
function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
params={
"reranker": "decay",
"function": "linear", # Linear decay
"origin": current_time, # Current time as reference point
"offset": 7 * 24 * 60 * 60, # One week (full relevance)
"decay": 0.5, # Articles from two weeks ago have half relevance
"scale": 14 * 24 * 60 * 60 # Two weeks scale parameter
}
)
앞의 코드에서
reranker: 시간 기반 감쇠 함수의 경우decay로 설정function: 감쇠 함수 유형(가우스, 노출 또는 선형)origin: 기준점(보통 현재 시간)offset: 문서가 완전한 관련성을 유지하는 기간scale: 오프셋 이후 연관성이 얼마나 빨리 감소하는지를 제어합니다.decay: 오프셋+스케일에서의 감쇠 계수(예: 0.5는 관련성이 절반임을 의미)
다양한 동작에 맞게 이러한 함수를 조정하는 방법을 보여주기 위해 다양한 파라미터로 지수 순위자를 구성한 것을 볼 수 있습니다.
6단계: 디케이 랭커 시각화하기
검색을 수행하기 전에 이렇게 서로 다르게 구성된 감쇠 순위가 어떻게 작동하는지 시각적으로 비교해 보겠습니다:
# Visualize the decay functions with different parameters
days = np.linspace(0, 90, 100)
# Gaussian: offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5
gaussian_values = [1.0 if d <= 7 else (0.5 ** ((d - 7) / 14)) for d in days]
# Exponential: offset=3, scale=10, decay=0.3
exponential_values = [1.0 if d <= 3 else (0.3 ** ((d - 3) / 10)) for d in days]
# Linear: offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5
linear_values = [1.0 if d <= 7 else max(0, 1.0 - ((d - 7) / 14) * 0.5) for d in days]
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.plot(days, gaussian_values, label='Gaussian (offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5)')
plt.plot(days, exponential_values, label='Exponential (offset=3, scale=10, decay=0.3)')
plt.plot(days, linear_values, label='Linear (offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5)')
plt.axhline(y=0.5, color='gray', linestyle='--', alpha=0.5, label='Half relevance')
plt.xlabel('Days ago')
plt.ylabel('Relevance factor')
plt.title('Decay Functions Comparison')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)
plt.savefig('decay_functions.png')
plt.close()
# Print numerical representation
print("\n=== TIME DECAY EFFECT VISUALIZATION ===")
print("Days ago | Gaussian | Exponential | Linear")
print("-----------------------------------------")
for days in [0, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90]:
# Calculate decay factors based on the parameters in our rankers
gaussian_decay = 1.0 if days <= 7 else (0.5 ** ((days - 7) / 14))
exponential_decay = 1.0 if days <= 3 else (0.3 ** ((days - 3) / 10))
linear_decay = 1.0 if days <= 7 else max(0, 1.0 - ((days - 7) / 14) * 0.5)
print(f"{days:2d} days | {gaussian_decay:.4f} | {exponential_decay:.4f} | {linear_decay:.4f}")
예상 결과
=== TIME DECAY EFFECT VISUALIZATION ===
Days ago | Gaussian | Exponential | Linear
-----------------------------------------
0 days | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000
3 days | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000
7 days | 1.0000 | 0.6178 | 1.0000
10 days | 0.8620 | 0.4305 | 0.8929
14 days | 0.7071 | 0.2660 | 0.7500
21 days | 0.5000 | 0.1145 | 0.5000
30 days | 0.3202 | 0.0387 | 0.1786
60 days | 0.0725 | 0.0010 | 0.0000
90 days | 0.0164 | 0.0000 | 0.0000
7단계: 결과 표시를 위한 헬퍼 기능
# Helper function to format search results with dates and scores
def print_search_results(results, title):
print(f"\n=== {title} ===")
for i, hit in enumerate(results[0]):
publish_date = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(hit.get('publish_date'))
days_from_now = (current_time - hit.get('publish_date')) / (24 * 60 * 60)
print(f"{i+1}. {hit.get('headline')}")
print(f" Published: {publish_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} ({int(days_from_now)} days ago)")
print(f" Score: {hit.score:.4f}")
print()
8단계: 표준 검색과 감쇠 기반 검색 비교하기
이제 검색 쿼리를 실행하여 감쇠 순위가 있는 경우와 없는 경우의 결과를 비교해 보겠습니다:
# Define our search query
query = "artificial intelligence advancements"
# 1. Search without decay ranking (purely based on semantic relevance)
standard_results = milvus_client.search(
collection_name,
data=[query],
anns_field="dense",
limit=7, # Get all our articles
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(standard_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITHOUT DECAY RANKING")
# Store original scores for later comparison
original_scores = {}
for hit in standard_results[0]:
original_scores[hit.get('headline')] = hit.score
# 2. Search with each decay function
# Gaussian decay
gaussian_results = milvus_client.search(
collection_name,
data=[query],
anns_field="dense",
limit=7,
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
ranker=gaussian_ranker,
consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(gaussian_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING")
# Exponential decay
exponential_results = milvus_client.search(
collection_name,
data=[query],
anns_field="dense",
limit=7,
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
ranker=exponential_ranker,
consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(exponential_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING")
# Linear decay
linear_results = milvus_client.search(
collection_name,
data=[query],
anns_field="dense",
limit=7,
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
ranker=linear_ranker,
consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(linear_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITH LINEAR DECAY RANKING")
예상 결과
=== SEARCH RESULTS WITHOUT DECAY RANKING ===
1. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.3670
2. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.4315
3. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.4316
4. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.6671
5. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.6674
6. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.7279
7. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.7661
=== SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.5322
2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.4316
3. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.3670
4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.1180
5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
=== SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING ===
1. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.3670
2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.3392
3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.1574
4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.0297
5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.0007
6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
=== SEARCH RESULTS WITH LINEAR DECAY RANKING ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.4767
2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.4316
3. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.3831
4. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.3670
5. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.3640
6. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.3335
7. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.2158
9단계: 점수 계산 이해하기
원본 연관성과 감쇠 요인을 결합하여 최종 점수를 계산하는 방법을 자세히 알아봅시다:
# Add a detailed breakdown for the first 3 results from Gaussian decay
print("\n=== SCORE CALCULATION BREAKDOWN (GAUSSIAN DECAY) ===")
for item in gaussian_results[0][:3]:
headline = item.get('headline')
publish_date = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(item.get('publish_date'))
days_ago = (current_time - item.get('publish_date')) / (24 * 60 * 60)
# Get the original score
original_score = original_scores.get(headline, 0)
# Calculate decay factor
decay_factor = 1.0 if days_ago <= 7 else (0.5 ** ((days_ago - 7) / 14))
# Show breakdown
print(f"Item: {headline}")
print(f" Published: {publish_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} ({int(days_ago)} days ago)")
print(f" Original relevance score: {original_score:.4f}")
print(f" Decay factor (Gaussian): {decay_factor:.4f}")
print(f" Expected final score = Original × Decay: {original_score * decay_factor:.4f}")
print(f" Actual final score: {item.score:.4f}")
print()
예상 결과
=== SCORE CALCULATION BREAKDOWN (GAUSSIAN DECAY) ===
Item: Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Original relevance score: 0.6674
Decay factor (Gaussian): 0.6730
Expected final score = Original × Decay: 0.4491
Actual final score: 0.5322
Item: New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Original relevance score: 0.4316
Decay factor (Gaussian): 1.0000
Expected final score = Original × Decay: 0.4316
Actual final score: 0.4316
Item: AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Original relevance score: 0.3670
Decay factor (Gaussian): 1.0000
Expected final score = Original × Decay: 0.3670
Actual final score: 0.3670
10단계: 시간 감쇠를 사용한 하이브리드 검색
보다 복잡한 시나리오의 경우, 하이브리드 검색을 사용하여 밀도(시맨틱) 및 희소(키워드) 벡터를 결합할 수 있습니다:
# Set up hybrid search (combining dense and sparse vectors)
dense_search = AnnSearchRequest(
data=[query],
anns_field="dense", # Search dense vectors
param={},
limit=7
)
sparse_search = AnnSearchRequest(
data=[query],
anns_field="sparse_vector", # Search sparse vectors (BM25)
param={},
limit=7
)
# Execute hybrid search with each decay function
# Gaussian decay
hybrid_gaussian_results = milvus_client.hybrid_search(
collection_name,
[dense_search, sparse_search],
ranker=gaussian_ranker,
limit=7,
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"]
)
print_search_results(hybrid_gaussian_results, "HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING")
# Exponential decay
hybrid_exponential_results = milvus_client.hybrid_search(
collection_name,
[dense_search, sparse_search],
ranker=exponential_ranker,
limit=7,
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"]
)
print_search_results(hybrid_exponential_results, "HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING")
예상 결과
=== HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 2.1467
2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.7926
3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.5322
4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.1180
5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
=== HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 1.6873
2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.7926
3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.1574
4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.0297
5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.0007
6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0001
7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
11단계: 다양한 매개변수 값으로 실험하기
스케일 매개변수를 조정하면 가우스 감쇠 함수에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 살펴봅시다:
# Create variations of the Gaussian decay function with different scale parameters
print("\n=== PARAMETER VARIATION EXPERIMENT: SCALE ===")
for scale_days in [7, 14, 30]:
scaled_ranker = Function(
name=f"time_decay_gaussian_{scale_days}",
input_field_names=["publish_date"],
function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
params={
"reranker": "decay",
"function": "gauss",
"origin": current_time,
"offset": 7 * 24 * 60 * 60, # Fixed offset of 7 days
"decay": 0.5, # Fixed decay of 0.5
"scale": scale_days * 24 * 60 * 60 # Variable scale
}
)
# Get results
scale_results = milvus_client.search(
collection_name,
data=[query],
anns_field="dense",
limit=7,
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
ranker=scaled_ranker,
consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(scale_results, f"SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = {scale_days} DAYS)")
예상 출력
=== PARAMETER VARIATION EXPERIMENT: SCALE ===
=== SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = 7 DAYS) ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.4316
2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.3670
3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.2699
4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.0004
5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
=== SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = 14 DAYS) ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.5322
2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.4316
3. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.3670
4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.1180
5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
=== SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = 30 DAYS) ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.6353
2. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.5097
3. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.4316
4. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.3670
5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
Score: 0.0767
6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0021
7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
12단계: 다양한 쿼리로 테스트하기
다양한 검색 쿼리에서 감쇠 순위가 어떻게 수행되는지 살펴봅시다:
# Try different queries with Gaussian decay
for test_query in ["machine learning", "neural networks", "ethics in AI"]:
print(f"\n=== TESTING QUERY: '{test_query}' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===")
test_results = milvus_client.search(
collection_name,
data=[test_query],
anns_field="dense",
limit=4,
output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
ranker=gaussian_ranker,
consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(test_results, f"TOP 4 RESULTS FOR '{test_query}'")
예상 결과
=== TESTING QUERY: 'machine learning' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===
=== TOP 4 RESULTS FOR 'machine learning' ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.8208
2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.7287
3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.6633
4. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
=== TESTING QUERY: 'neural networks' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===
=== TOP 4 RESULTS FOR 'neural networks' ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.8509
2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.7574
3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
Score: 0.6364
4. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
=== TESTING QUERY: 'ethics in AI' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===
=== TOP 4 RESULTS FOR 'ethics in AI' ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
Score: 0.7977
2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
Score: 0.7322
3. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
Score: 0.0814
4. AI Research Advancements Published in January
Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
Score: 0.0000
결론
Milvus의 감쇠 함수를 사용한 시간 기반 랭킹은 의미적 관련성과 최신성의 균형을 맞출 수 있는 강력한 방법을 제공합니다. 적절한 감쇠 함수와 매개변수를 구성하면 의미적 관련성을 유지하면서 새로운 콘텐츠를 강조하는 검색 환경을 만들 수 있습니다.
이 접근 방식은 특히 다음과 같은 경우에 유용합니다:
뉴스 및 미디어 플랫폼
이커머스 제품 목록
소셜 미디어 콘텐츠 피드
지식 베이스 및 문서 시스템
연구 논문 리포지토리
감쇠 함수의 수학을 이해하고 다양한 매개변수를 실험함으로써 검색 시스템을 미세 조정하여 특정 사용 사례에 맞는 관련성과 최신성 사이의 최적의 균형을 제공할 수 있습니다.