Tutorial: Implementación de la clasificación basada en el tiempo en MilvusCompatible with Milvus 2.6.x

En muchas aplicaciones de búsqueda, la frescura del contenido es tan importante como su relevancia. Los artículos de noticias, los listados de productos, las publicaciones en redes sociales y los trabajos de investigación se benefician de sistemas de clasificación que equilibran la relevancia semántica con la actualidad. Este tutorial muestra cómo implementar la clasificación basada en el tiempo en Milvus utilizando clasificadores de decaimiento.

Comprender los decay rankers en Milvus

Los clasificadores por decaimiento le permiten potenciar o penalizar documentos basándose en valores numéricos (como marcas de tiempo) relativos a un punto de referencia. Para la clasificación basada en el tiempo, esto significa que los documentos más recientes pueden recibir puntuaciones más altas que los más antiguos, incluso cuando su relevancia semántica es similar.

Milvus admite tres tipos de clasificadores de decaimiento:

• Gaussiano (gauss): Una curva en forma de campana que proporciona un decaimiento suave y gradual.

• Exponencial (exp): Crea una caída inicial más pronunciada para enfatizar fuertemente el contenido reciente.

• Lineal (linear): Una caída en línea recta que es predecible y fácil de entender.

Cada clasificador tiene características diferentes que lo hacen adecuado para distintos casos de uso. Para obtener más información, consulte Decay Ranker Overview.

Construir un sistema de búsqueda consciente del tiempo

Crearemos un sistema de búsqueda de artículos de noticias que demuestre cómo clasificar eficazmente el contenido basándose tanto en la relevancia como en el tiempo. Empecemos con la implementación:

import datetime
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from pymilvus import (
    MilvusClient,
    DataType,
    Function,
    FunctionType,
    AnnSearchRequest,
)

# Create connection to Milvus
milvus_client = MilvusClient("http://localhost:19530")

# Define collection name
collection_name = "news_articles_tutorial"

# Clean up any existing collection with the same name
milvus_client.drop_collection(collection_name)

Paso 1: Diseñar el esquema

Para la búsqueda basada en el tiempo, necesitamos almacenar la fecha y hora de publicación junto con el contenido:

# Create schema with fields for content and temporal information
schema = milvus_client.create_schema(enable_dynamic_field=False, auto_id=True)
schema.add_field("id", DataType.INT64, is_primary=True)
schema.add_field("headline", DataType.VARCHAR, max_length=200, enable_analyzer=True)
schema.add_field("content", DataType.VARCHAR, max_length=2000, enable_analyzer=True)
schema.add_field("dense", DataType.FLOAT_VECTOR, dim=1024)  # For dense embeddings
schema.add_field("sparse_vector", DataType.SPARSE_FLOAT_VECTOR)  # For sparse (BM25) search
schema.add_field("publish_date", DataType.INT64)  # Timestamp for decay ranking

Paso 2: Configurar las funciones de incrustación

Configuraremos funciones de incrustación densas (semántica) y dispersas (palabra clave):

# Create embedding function for semantic search
text_embedding_function = Function(
    name="siliconflow_embedding",
    function_type=FunctionType.TEXTEMBEDDING,
    input_field_names=["content"],
    output_field_names=["dense"],
    params={
        "provider": "siliconflow",
        "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5",
        "credential": "your-api-key"
    }
)
schema.add_function(text_embedding_function)

# Create BM25 function for keyword search
bm25_function = Function(
    name="bm25",
    input_field_names=["content"],
    output_field_names=["sparse_vector"],
    function_type=FunctionType.BM25,
)
schema.add_function(bm25_function)

Para más detalles sobre cómo utilizar las funciones de incrustación de Milvus, consulte Visión general de las funciones de incrustación.

Paso 3: Configurar los parámetros de índice

Configuremos los parámetros de índice apropiados para la búsqueda rápida de vectores:

# Set up indexes for fast search
index_params = milvus_client.prepare_index_params()

# Dense vector index
index_params.add_index(field_name="dense", index_type="AUTOINDEX", metric_type="L2")

# Sparse vector index
index_params.add_index(
    field_name="sparse_vector",
    index_name="sparse_inverted_index",
    index_type="AUTOINDEX",
    metric_type="BM25",
)

# Create the collection with our schema and indexes
milvus_client.create_collection(
    collection_name,
    schema=schema,
    index_params=index_params,
    consistency_level="Bounded"
)

Paso 4: Preparar datos de muestra

Para este tutorial, crearemos un conjunto de artículos de noticias con diferentes fechas de publicación. Observe que hemos incluido pares de artículos con un contenido casi idéntico pero fechas diferentes para demostrar claramente el efecto de la clasificación decaída:

# Get current time
current_time = int(datetime.datetime.now().timestamp())
current_date = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(current_time)
print(f"Current time: {current_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')}")

# Sample news articles spanning different dates
articles = [
    {
        "headline": "AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement",
        "content": "Researchers announced a major breakthrough in AI-based medical diagnostics, enabling faster and more accurate detection of rare diseases.",
        "publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=120)).timestamp())  # ~4 months ago
    },
    {
        "headline": "Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race",
        "content": "Major technology companies are investing billions in a new race to develop the most advanced artificial intelligence systems.",
        "publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=60)).timestamp())  # ~2 months ago
    },
    {
        "headline": "AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body",
        "content": "A consortium of international organizations has released new guidelines addressing ethical concerns in artificial intelligence development and deployment.",
        "publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=30)).timestamp())  # 1 month ago
    },
    {
        "headline": "Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress",
        "content": "The newest generation of deep learning models demonstrates unprecedented capabilities in language understanding and generation.",
        "publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=15)).timestamp())  # 15 days ago
    },
    # Articles with identical content but different dates
    {
        "headline": "AI Research Advancements Published in January",
        "content": "Breakthrough research in artificial intelligence shows remarkable advancements in multiple domains.",
        "publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=90)).timestamp())  # ~3 months ago
    },
    {
        "headline": "New AI Research Results Released This Week",
        "content": "Breakthrough research in artificial intelligence shows remarkable advancements in multiple domains.",
        "publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=5)).timestamp())  # Very recent - 5 days ago
    },
    {
        "headline": "AI Development Updates Released Yesterday",
        "content": "Recent developments in artificial intelligence research are showing promising results across various applications.",
        "publish_date": int((current_date - datetime.timedelta(days=1)).timestamp())  # Just yesterday
    },
]

# Insert articles into the collection
milvus_client.insert(collection_name, articles)
print(f"Inserted {len(articles)} articles into the collection")

Paso 5: Configurar diferentes clasificadores de decaimiento

Ahora vamos a crear tres decay rankers diferentes, cada uno con parámetros distintos para resaltar sus diferencias:

# Use current time as reference point
print(f"Using current time as reference point")

# Create a Gaussian decay ranker
gaussian_ranker = Function(
    name="time_decay_gaussian",
    input_field_names=["publish_date"],
    function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
    params={
        "reranker": "decay",
        "function": "gauss",           # Gaussian/bell curve decay
        "origin": current_time,        # Current time as reference point
        "offset": 7 * 24 * 60 * 60,    # One week (full relevance)
        "decay": 0.5,                  # Articles from two weeks ago have half relevance 
        "scale": 14 * 24 * 60 * 60     # Two weeks scale parameter
    }
)

# Create an exponential decay ranker with different parameters
exponential_ranker = Function(
    name="time_decay_exponential",
    input_field_names=["publish_date"],
    function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
    params={
        "reranker": "decay",
        "function": "exp",             # Exponential decay
        "origin": current_time,        # Current time as reference point
        "offset": 3 * 24 * 60 * 60,    # Shorter offset (3 days vs 7 days)
        "decay": 0.3,                  # Steeper decay (0.3 vs 0.5) 
        "scale": 10 * 24 * 60 * 60     # Different scale (10 days vs 14 days)
    }
)

# Create a linear decay ranker
linear_ranker = Function(
    name="time_decay_linear",
    input_field_names=["publish_date"],
    function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
    params={
        "reranker": "decay",
        "function": "linear",          # Linear decay
        "origin": current_time,        # Current time as reference point
        "offset": 7 * 24 * 60 * 60,    # One week (full relevance)
        "decay": 0.5,                  # Articles from two weeks ago have half relevance
        "scale": 14 * 24 * 60 * 60     # Two weeks scale parameter
    }
)

En el código anterior:

• reranker: decay para las funciones de descomposición basadas en el tiempo.

• function: El tipo de función de decaimiento (gauss, exp, o lineal)

• origin: El punto de referencia (normalmente la hora actual)

• offset: El periodo durante el cual los documentos mantienen toda su relevancia

• scale: Controla la rapidez con la que disminuye la relevancia más allá del offset

• decay: El factor de decaimiento en offset+escala (por ejemplo, 0,5 significa la mitad de relevancia)

Observe que hemos configurado el clasificador exponencial con diferentes parámetros para demostrar cómo puede ajustar estas funciones para diferentes comportamientos.

Paso 6: Visualizar los decay rankers

Antes de realizar las búsquedas, vamos a crear una comparación visual de cómo se comportan estos decay rankers configurados de forma diferente:

# Visualize the decay functions with different parameters
days = np.linspace(0, 90, 100)
# Gaussian: offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5
gaussian_values = [1.0 if d <= 7 else (0.5 ** ((d - 7) / 14)) for d in days]
# Exponential: offset=3, scale=10, decay=0.3
exponential_values = [1.0 if d <= 3 else (0.3 ** ((d - 3) / 10)) for d in days]
# Linear: offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5
linear_values = [1.0 if d <= 7 else max(0, 1.0 - ((d - 7) / 14) * 0.5) for d in days]

plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.plot(days, gaussian_values, label='Gaussian (offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5)')
plt.plot(days, exponential_values, label='Exponential (offset=3, scale=10, decay=0.3)')
plt.plot(days, linear_values, label='Linear (offset=7, scale=14, decay=0.5)')
plt.axhline(y=0.5, color='gray', linestyle='--', alpha=0.5, label='Half relevance')
plt.xlabel('Days ago')
plt.ylabel('Relevance factor')
plt.title('Decay Functions Comparison')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)
plt.savefig('decay_functions.png')
plt.close()

# Print numerical representation
print("\n=== TIME DECAY EFFECT VISUALIZATION ===")
print("Days ago | Gaussian | Exponential | Linear")
print("-----------------------------------------")
for days in [0, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90]:
    # Calculate decay factors based on the parameters in our rankers
    gaussian_decay = 1.0 if days <= 7 else (0.5 ** ((days - 7) / 14))
    exponential_decay = 1.0 if days <= 3 else (0.3 ** ((days - 3) / 10))
    linear_decay = 1.0 if days <= 7 else max(0, 1.0 - ((days - 7) / 14) * 0.5)
    
    print(f"{days:2d} days | {gaussian_decay:.4f}   | {exponential_decay:.4f}     | {linear_decay:.4f}")

Resultado esperado:

=== TIME DECAY EFFECT VISUALIZATION ===
Days ago | Gaussian | Exponential | Linear
-----------------------------------------
 0 days | 1.0000   | 1.0000     | 1.0000
 3 days | 1.0000   | 1.0000     | 1.0000
 7 days | 1.0000   | 0.6178     | 1.0000
10 days | 0.8620   | 0.4305     | 0.8929
14 days | 0.7071   | 0.2660     | 0.7500
21 days | 0.5000   | 0.1145     | 0.5000
30 days | 0.3202   | 0.0387     | 0.1786
60 days | 0.0725   | 0.0010     | 0.0000
90 days | 0.0164   | 0.0000     | 0.0000

Paso 7: Función de ayuda para la visualización de resultados

# Helper function to format search results with dates and scores
def print_search_results(results, title):
    print(f"\n=== {title} ===")
    for i, hit in enumerate(results[0]):
        publish_date = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(hit.get('publish_date'))
        days_from_now = (current_time - hit.get('publish_date')) / (24 * 60 * 60)
        
        print(f"{i+1}. {hit.get('headline')}")
        print(f"   Published: {publish_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} ({int(days_from_now)} days ago)")
        print(f"   Score: {hit.score:.4f}")
        print()

Paso 8: Comparar la búsqueda estándar con la basada en el decaimiento

Ahora vamos a ejecutar una consulta de búsqueda y comparar los resultados con y sin la clasificación por decaimiento:

# Define our search query
query = "artificial intelligence advancements"

# 1. Search without decay ranking (purely based on semantic relevance)
standard_results = milvus_client.search(
    collection_name,
    data=[query],
    anns_field="dense",
    limit=7,  # Get all our articles
    output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
    consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(standard_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITHOUT DECAY RANKING")

# Store original scores for later comparison
original_scores = {}
for hit in standard_results[0]:
    original_scores[hit.get('headline')] = hit.score

# 2. Search with each decay function
# Gaussian decay
gaussian_results = milvus_client.search(
    collection_name,
    data=[query],
    anns_field="dense",
    limit=7,
    output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
    ranker=gaussian_ranker,
    consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(gaussian_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING")

# Exponential decay
exponential_results = milvus_client.search(
    collection_name,
    data=[query],
    anns_field="dense",
    limit=7,
    output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
    ranker=exponential_ranker,
    consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(exponential_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING")

# Linear decay
linear_results = milvus_client.search(
    collection_name,
    data=[query],
    anns_field="dense",
    limit=7,
    output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
    ranker=linear_ranker,
    consistency_level="Bounded"
)
print_search_results(linear_results, "SEARCH RESULTS WITH LINEAR DECAY RANKING")

Resultado esperado:

=== SEARCH RESULTS WITHOUT DECAY RANKING ===
1. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.3670

2. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.4315

3. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.4316

4. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.6671

5. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.6674

6. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.7279

7. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.7661

=== SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.5322

2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.4316

3. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.3670

4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.1180

5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

=== SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING ===
1. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.3670

2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.3392

3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.1574

4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.0297

5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.0007

6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

=== SEARCH RESULTS WITH LINEAR DECAY RANKING ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.4767

2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.4316

3. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.3831

4. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.3670

5. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.3640

6. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.3335

7. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.2158

Paso 9: Entender el cálculo de la puntuación

Veamos cómo se calculan las puntuaciones finales combinando la relevancia original con los factores de deterioro:

# Add a detailed breakdown for the first 3 results from Gaussian decay
print("\n=== SCORE CALCULATION BREAKDOWN (GAUSSIAN DECAY) ===")
for item in gaussian_results[0][:3]:
    headline = item.get('headline')
    publish_date = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(item.get('publish_date'))
    days_ago = (current_time - item.get('publish_date')) / (24 * 60 * 60)
    
    # Get the original score
    original_score = original_scores.get(headline, 0)
    
    # Calculate decay factor
    decay_factor = 1.0 if days_ago <= 7 else (0.5 ** ((days_ago - 7) / 14))
    
    # Show breakdown
    print(f"Item: {headline}")
    print(f"  Published: {publish_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} ({int(days_ago)} days ago)")
    print(f"  Original relevance score: {original_score:.4f}")
    print(f"  Decay factor (Gaussian): {decay_factor:.4f}")
    print(f"  Expected final score = Original × Decay: {original_score * decay_factor:.4f}")
    print(f"  Actual final score: {item.score:.4f}")
    print()

Resultado esperado:

=== SCORE CALCULATION BREAKDOWN (GAUSSIAN DECAY) ===
Item: Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
  Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
  Original relevance score: 0.6674
  Decay factor (Gaussian): 0.6730
  Expected final score = Original × Decay: 0.4491
  Actual final score: 0.5322

Item: New AI Research Results Released This Week
  Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
  Original relevance score: 0.4316
  Decay factor (Gaussian): 1.0000
  Expected final score = Original × Decay: 0.4316
  Actual final score: 0.4316

Item: AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
  Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
  Original relevance score: 0.3670
  Decay factor (Gaussian): 1.0000
  Expected final score = Original × Decay: 0.3670
  Actual final score: 0.3670

Paso 10: Búsqueda híbrida con decaimiento temporal

Para escenarios más complejos, podemos combinar vectores densos (semánticos) y dispersos (palabras clave) utilizando la búsqueda híbrida:

# Set up hybrid search (combining dense and sparse vectors)
dense_search = AnnSearchRequest(
    data=[query],
    anns_field="dense",  # Search dense vectors
    param={},
    limit=7
)

sparse_search = AnnSearchRequest(
    data=[query],
    anns_field="sparse_vector",  # Search sparse vectors (BM25)
    param={},
    limit=7
)

# Execute hybrid search with each decay function
# Gaussian decay
hybrid_gaussian_results = milvus_client.hybrid_search(
    collection_name,
    [dense_search, sparse_search],
    ranker=gaussian_ranker,
    limit=7,
    output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"]
)
print_search_results(hybrid_gaussian_results, "HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING")

# Exponential decay
hybrid_exponential_results = milvus_client.hybrid_search(
    collection_name,
    [dense_search, sparse_search],
    ranker=exponential_ranker,
    limit=7,
    output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"]
)
print_search_results(hybrid_exponential_results, "HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING")

Resultado esperado:

=== HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY RANKING ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 2.1467

2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.7926

3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.5322

4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.1180

5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

=== HYBRID SEARCH RESULTS WITH EXPONENTIAL DECAY RANKING ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 1.6873

2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.7926

3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.1574

4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.0297

5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.0007

6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0001

7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

Paso 11: Experimentar con distintos valores de los parámetros

Veamos cómo afecta el ajuste del parámetro de escala a la función de caída gaussiana:

# Create variations of the Gaussian decay function with different scale parameters
print("\n=== PARAMETER VARIATION EXPERIMENT: SCALE ===")
for scale_days in [7, 14, 30]:
    scaled_ranker = Function(
        name=f"time_decay_gaussian_{scale_days}",
        input_field_names=["publish_date"],
        function_type=FunctionType.RERANK,
        params={
            "reranker": "decay",
            "function": "gauss",
            "origin": current_time,
            "offset": 7 * 24 * 60 * 60,  # Fixed offset of 7 days
            "decay": 0.5,                # Fixed decay of 0.5
            "scale": scale_days * 24 * 60 * 60  # Variable scale
        }
    )
    
    # Get results
    scale_results = milvus_client.search(
        collection_name,
        data=[query],
        anns_field="dense",
        limit=7,
        output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
        ranker=scaled_ranker,
        consistency_level="Bounded"
    )
    
    print_search_results(scale_results, f"SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = {scale_days} DAYS)")

Resultado esperado:

=== PARAMETER VARIATION EXPERIMENT: SCALE ===

=== SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = 7 DAYS) ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.4316

2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.3670

3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.2699

4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.0004

5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

=== SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = 14 DAYS) ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.5322

2. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.4316

3. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.3670

4. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.1180

5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

=== SEARCH WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY (SCALE = 30 DAYS) ===
1. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.6353

2. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.5097

3. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.4316

4. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.3670

5. Tech Giants Compete in New AI Race
   Published: 2025-03-16 (60 days ago)
   Score: 0.0767

6. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0021

7. AI Breakthrough Enables Medical Diagnosis Advancement
   Published: 2025-01-15 (120 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

Paso 12: Pruebas con diferentes consultas

Veamos cómo se comporta la clasificación del decaimiento con diferentes consultas de búsqueda:

# Try different queries with Gaussian decay
for test_query in ["machine learning", "neural networks", "ethics in AI"]:
    print(f"\n=== TESTING QUERY: '{test_query}' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===")
    test_results = milvus_client.search(
        collection_name,
        data=[test_query],
        anns_field="dense",
        limit=4,
        output_fields=["headline", "content", "publish_date"],
        ranker=gaussian_ranker,
        consistency_level="Bounded"
    )
    print_search_results(test_results, f"TOP 4 RESULTS FOR '{test_query}'")

Resultado esperado:

=== TESTING QUERY: 'machine learning' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===

=== TOP 4 RESULTS FOR 'machine learning' ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.8208

2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.7287

3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.6633

4. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

=== TESTING QUERY: 'neural networks' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===

=== TOP 4 RESULTS FOR 'neural networks' ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.8509

2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.7574

3. Latest Deep Learning Models Show Remarkable Progress
   Published: 2025-04-30 (15 days ago)
   Score: 0.6364

4. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

=== TESTING QUERY: 'ethics in AI' WITH GAUSSIAN DECAY ===

=== TOP 4 RESULTS FOR 'ethics in AI' ===
1. New AI Research Results Released This Week
   Published: 2025-05-10 (5 days ago)
   Score: 0.7977

2. AI Development Updates Released Yesterday
   Published: 2025-05-14 (1 days ago)
   Score: 0.7322

3. AI Ethics Guidelines Released by International Body
   Published: 2025-04-15 (30 days ago)
   Score: 0.0814

4. AI Research Advancements Published in January
   Published: 2025-02-14 (90 days ago)
   Score: 0.0000

Conclusión

La clasificación basada en el tiempo utilizando funciones de decaimiento en Milvus proporciona una forma potente de equilibrar la relevancia semántica con la actualidad. Configurando la función y los parámetros de decaimiento apropiados, puede crear experiencias de búsqueda que destaquen el contenido reciente sin dejar de respetar la relevancia semántica.

Este enfoque es especialmente valioso para

• Plataformas de noticias y medios de comunicación

• Listados de productos de comercio electrónico

• Contenidos de redes sociales

• Bases de conocimiento y sistemas de documentación

• Repositorios de artículos de investigación

Si comprende las funciones matemáticas de la descomposición y experimenta con distintos parámetros, podrá ajustar su sistema de búsqueda para que ofrezca el equilibrio óptimo entre relevancia y frescura para su caso de uso específico.